Here’s a sad idea for surf tourist companies and I’m not sure I should even suggest it – selling trips to spots which are going to disappear within a decade.
A top climate scientist has predicted that small island states will have to be evacuated within 10 years as sea levels rise and saltwater infiltrates drinking water supplies. Michael Mann largely cites the melting of Arctic sea ice at rates much higher than the models which governments have been basing their assumptions on. Others, like James Lovelock, have also criticised the models for not including the effects of greenhouse gases released when the earth and seas warm.
The low-lying islands that are threatened include Kiribati (population 78,000), the Maldives (population 269,000), the Marshall Islands (population 58,000), Tokelau (population 2,000), and Tuvalu (population 9,000).
Michael Mann hopes that the immediate threat of climate change refugees and the loss of ancient cultures may provide a wake-up call to the world’s governments. I’m not so sure that this argument will have any effect – wasn’t it the US that leant on Britain to evacuate Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean to set up a military base – without thinking about the effect on the refugees?
My optimistic side wonders if the world’s top surfers and their sponsors could react to the possibility of losing the Maldives and countless other photogenic surf spots they use to sell themselves to pressure governments, corporations and people to take urgent action on reducing climate change. Perhaps they’ll feel a moral responsibility to the climate change refugees because surfers are partly to blame for the climate change because they’ve been flocking to these islands by the polluting plane-load?
Otherwise we may only have less than 4000 days to savour those idyllic reef breaks and – more seriously – about 400 000 people will be looking for a new home.